Optimal Escape Theory
Optimal Escape Theory – Gambling with the Reaper
Lizards have been prime subjects
for ethological studies by scientists – reproduction cost, foraging mode, and
predator-prey interaction are a few topics that have been investigated in the
lizard world (Lizard Ecology 1994, 2007). I'd like to dive further into predator-prey
interaction and discuss a paper by Ydenberg and Dill (1986) titled "The
Economics of Fleeing From Predators". This literature is the backbone of
my research methods.
The word
"economics" in the title of this literature is extremely appropriate.
Ydenberg and Dill outline the literal costs–benefit framework that prey attempt
to balance to survive potential predatory advances. Bankruptcy is getting
ran down by a lion, winning the lottery is successfully venturing to get to the
watering hole, and back, alive. Ydenberg and Dill refute statements that claim
detection of predators by prey immediately warrants a response, and that
instead prey detect predators long before they make the decision to flee.
Ydenberg and Dill go into
many examples of cost–benefit economics, using other taxa of wildlife along
with a plethora of figures. Saving the audience of from minutiae, essentially,
there is a cost the prey has to burden when it flees from predators. These
burdens can be losses of foraging time, social interaction, and patrol of
territory. So – Ydenberg and Dill argue that prey roll the dice, and make conscience
bets against death itself delivered by the hands of a famished predator,
because they if they weasel their way into staying around that area they've selected
without dying (not being detected or captured), it's worth it!
Anolis lizards display this theory. Lizard locomotion is affected by temperature (Swoap et al., 1993). These lizards will flee sooner when approached at low temperatures, but they let predators get closer to them at higher temperatures because they're faster. This absolutely blows my mind that lizards do this. Anolis are more "bold" a higher temperatures, the bet against death is less risky. Now this changes even more when you throw in cover presence, cryptic morphology, and even the angle at which predators approach. My question for science: "Can we use this theory to own our advantage and increase detection of lizards in someway?".
Literature
Cited
Vitt L. J.
and E. R. Pianka. Lizard Ecology: Historical and Experimental Perspectives.
1994. Princeton University Press.
Reilly S.
M., L. B. McBrayer and D. B. Miles. Lizard Ecology. 2007. Cambridge University
Press.
Swoap S.
J., T. P. Johnson, R. K. Josephson and A. F. Bennett. Temperature, muscle power
output and limitations on burst locomotor performance of the lizard dipsosaurus
dorsalis. 1993. Journal of Experimental Biology. 174: 185–197
Ydenberg, R. C., and L. M. Dill. 1986. The
economics of fleeing from predators. Advances in the Study of Behavior
16:229-249.
To catch the lizard you have to be the lizard 🦎
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely!
Delete